Dasha Plekhanova vs Katie Swan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Jun at 05:06 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Plekhanova vs K. Swan

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Plekhanova 1 - 0 Swan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Dasha Plekhanova winning 2 and Katie Swan winning 1. The last match between Dasha Plekhanova and Katie Swan was at the W35 Decatur, 14-06-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Dasha Plekhanova getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Plekhanova | 1 |
| Swan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) W35 Decatur(06-14-25)
D. Plekhanova vs K. Swan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $221,866 |
| 56.99% (53-40) | Career Total W/L | 62.30% (238-144) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 15 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Plekhanova vs K. Swan Match Preview:
- Swan has a slight edge on second serve performance, with 40% of points won compared to Plekhanova’s 38.18%. Could this make a crucial difference in pressure situations?
- Plekhanova outperforms Swan on return game stats, winning 53.15% of opponents' second serve points versus Swan's 50.95%.
- The first serve return rate significantly favors Plekhanova, who leads Swan 38.32% to 27.21%.
- Under pressure, Swan shines, saving 53.68% of breakpoints compared to Plekhanova's 38.79%, indicating a psychological edge in tight moments.
- Over the last year, Swan has a superior overall match win percentage at 75%, compared to Plekhanova's 64.44%.
- Surface preferences show Swan excels on I.hard with 67% wins, whereas Plekhanova performs best on Clay with 65% wins.
- In terms of player level, Swan has dominated at lower-tier Futures/Satellites tournaments, winning 87.5%, while Plekhanova has been competitive at higher-level Challengers/ITF events with 60.71% wins.
- The quality of opponents faced is quite similar, with Swan's opponents averaging a rank of 434.75, slightly lower than Plekhanova's 436.82.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Plekhanova may have the advantage, having won 73% of such situations compared to Swan's 50% in the past year.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Plekhanova again holds the lead with 45.65%, while Swan has converted 40% of her opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 14, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Swan and Plekhanova presents an intriguing battle of strengths and weaknesses. While Swan shows proficiency in handling pressure and has a higher match win percentage over the past year, Plekhanova counters with superior return stats and breakpoint conversion.
Surface and event levels also play a critical role; Swan excels on I.hard but has mostly shined in lower-tier tournaments, whereas Plekhanova has proven herself competitive on higher-level circuits, which could be pivotal in this encounter.
The key will likely be in handling deciding sets, where Plekhanova has shown formidable resilience. Considering all factors, Plekhanova may have a slight edge, making her the more likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Dasha Plekhanova vs Katie Swan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Plekhanova vs K. Swan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:24:18 | Average Match Time | 2:24:18 |
| 75% (80/107) | 1st Serve % | 66% (49/74) |
| 50% (40/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (28/49) |
| 52% (14/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 49% (36/74) | Return Points Win % | 50% (53/107) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Plekhanova Recent Matches Played
K. Swan Recent Matches Played

D. Plekhanova vs K. Swan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.99% (53/40) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.30% (238/144) |
| 55.24% (116/94) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.03% (526/322) |
| 53.04% (1012/896) | Games Win/Loss | 55.31% (4233/3420) |
| 56.92% (37/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.07% (165/81) |
| 65.22% (15/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 40.00% (14/21) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 73.21% (41/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 40.00% (18/27) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 115 | Aces Total | 1299 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 213 | Total Double Faults | 1406 |
| 1:30:56 | Average Match Time | 1:28:51 |
| 405.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 226.64 |
| 69% (3588/5194) | 1st Serve % | 59% (12909/21757) |
| 59% (2125/3588) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (8742/12909) |
| 46% (741/1606) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3971/8856) |
| 51% (361/703) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1363/2806) |
| 48% (2523/5286) | Return Points Win % | 46% (10236/22260) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 37.04% (10/17) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 38.46% (10/16) |
| 59.02% (36/25) | Challenger W/L | 64.26% (178/99) |
| 54.84% (17/14) | Futures W/L | 83.33% (35/7) |
| 58% (52/89) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (232/362) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 42% (8/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (34/64) |
| 63% (15/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (47/101) |
| 84% (50/42) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (243/210) |
| 16% (50/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (243/29) |
| 26% (43/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (138/27) |